no comments

Your name and gender could prevent you from landing an interview. But there's a solution.



<br>

You meet all the qualifications. Your résumé is perfect. But you don’t get a callback.

Maybe there were a wealth of qualified candidates. Or maybe the reviewer saw your name and just “had a feeling.” Too often, the latter turns out to be true, as unconscious bias often plays a role in hiring decisions, and it largely affects women and people of color.

Photo by WOCinTech Chat/Flickr (cropped).

That’s why the local government in Victoria, Australia, recently launched an 18-month experiment with blind applications.

Yeah, it’s basically the human-resources equivalent of “The Voice.”

GIF via “The Voice.”

The trial will evaluate which pieces of personal information like age, gender, name, or location should be shown or hidden from reviewers during the employment application process. Government departments and agencies as well as a few private companies in the region will take part (the latter will receive financial benefits for participating).

But of course, Australia isn’t the only nation with this problem. Not even close.

Here’s why hiring managers and recruiters everywhere need to consider blind applications.

1. Because just using your given name can make your job hunt exponentially longer.

One study found that candidates with African-American-sounding names were 50% less likely to move forward to job interviews than candidates with white-sounding names, even with identical résumés. And research from the Australian National University revealed that to get as many interviews as an applicant with an Anglo-sounding name, a person with a Middle Eastern name would have to submit 64% more applications. A person with a Chinese-sounding name? 68%.

Photo by iStock.

2. Because even though we’ve shown them time and time again, some people still don’t think women can get the job done.

In the1970s and ’80s, orchestras around the world began using blind auditions to fill their ranks. Musicians perform behind a screen to disguise themselves, even removing their shoes if they could be a giveaway.

Photo by Miguel Medina/AFP/Getty Images.

When orchestras use the screen — even just for preliminary auditions — women are 50% more likely to make it to the final round of judging. Many attribute the increase in women in performance ensembles over the years to these blind auditions.

A recent (non-peer-reviewed) study of women coders got similar results. When those judging their work didn’t know they were women, the reviewers were more likely to accept their suggestions.

Photo by WOCinTech Chat/Flickr (cropped).

3. Because even your neighborhood can make people think twice about hiring you.

As if name and gender weren’t enough, individuals making hiring decisions sometimes judge applicants on their address too. Regardless of race, people living in more affluent, better-educated neighborhoods receive more callbacks for interviews.

Photo by iStock.

Our biases continue into the interview process. Luckily, there ways to overcome them there too.

Some argue that interviews themselves are simply exercises in affirmation bias and aren’t the best way to hire people. As Ori Brafman, behavioral expert and co-author of the book “Sway,” told the New York Times: “Time and again, the research shows that interviews are poor predictors of job performance because we tend to hire people we think are similar to us rather than those who are objectively going to do a good job.”

His suggestion? Replace the “first-date” model often used in interviews and stick to the facts: examples of past performance.

Photo by iStock.

Unconscious bias is just that: unconscious. But there are steps we can take to give qualified applicants a fair shot.

All of us, regardless of gender, race, or age have biases. It’s up to us to acknowledge them, identify them, and take active steps to keep them out of the decision-making process.

It’s easier said than done, but like this trial run in Victoria, we have to start somewhere.

Photo by iStock.

<br>



Source link

Reply

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Shares
1490438638_maxresdefault.jpg
10 Famous Cartoon Characters Based on Real People
1490435001_maxresdefault.jpg
10 Things You Didn’t Know The Use For
1490431347_maxresdefault.jpg
10 Most Hilarious News Videobombs
1490427664_maxresdefault.jpg
10 Most Anticipated Movies That Sucked
nSYoWJSBp30
Here's why American parents are now ditching expensive cribs for a simple, cardboard box.
M34000-1-2ce6f015f6554a198031d61d9696f1be.jpg
Harriet Tubman helped without hesitation. Here's a unique opportunity to return the favor.
1490458193_maxresdefault.jpg
15 Things Introverts Want You To Know
iStock-536217107-71a0318f191ad4ad1112276ef1afd2d1.jpg
This heartbreaking fact about the #MissingDCGirls should concern all of us.
The game is the game! Listen carefully to these facts about The Wire (23 Photos)
my_dog_farts_rainbows.jpg
My Dog Farts Rainbows
Outdoor venues so cool they could make a Nickleback concert fun (27 Photos)
The Liquid Cat
1490449511_maxresdefault.jpg
Fails of the Week: Big air, bigger fails! (March 2017) || FailArmy
1490308202_maxresdefault.jpg
Throwback Thursday Fails: Try not to laugh! || FailArmy
1490134521_maxresdefault.jpg
Basketball Fails: March Madness! (March 2017) || FailArmy
1489819396_maxresdefault.jpg
Fails of the Week: Lookout for that fence! (March 2017) || FailArmy
1490453533_maxresdefault.jpg
You Have To Be Kidding Me | Tow Truck Makes Things Worse
1490366737_maxresdefault.jpg
Crazy Weather from the JukinVideo Vault
1490123888_maxresdefault.jpg
Climbing to the Top of Tower Crane | Scary Jobs
1490106539_maxresdefault.jpg
Life Jacket Made of Pants | Survival Tips
1490390039_980x.png
Getting Ready with Young Paris, the Rapper Setting New York Alight
1490350382_980x.png
Can You Survive The Highlights From This John Mayer Profile?
1490310706_980x.jpg
"Raw" Actress Garance Marillier on Prepping a Cannibalistic Character and Hating Horror Movies
1490271064_980x.png
Selena Gomez Is Peak "Grateful" But Maybe Not Happy in Vogue's 73 Questions